Does Pawlo show who fed the pet, like Dana does?

Yes. Attribution is not the difference between these two. Pawlo advertises task attribution in the same form Dana uses, down to the example on its homepage showing a task completed by a named person at a specific time. Any comparison that gives Dana that row alone has not read their site.

Then why would I pay for Dana?

You would not, for coordination alone. Dana’s free plan already covers unlimited pets, unlimited caregivers, attribution, reminders and streaks. Pro buys depth in the parts Pawlo does not advertise at all: a daily Dana AI allowance instead of the free plan’s one-time set of checks, the Records Vault for documents, and more streak protection.

Can I keep the actual vaccination certificate in either app?

In Dana, yes, in the Records Vault, which ships with Pro. It shares through a code-gated link that expires and can be revoked, so a clinic needs no account. Pawlo’s public materials do not advertise document storage.

Which one is better for a dog walker or a sitter?

Dana, on the evidence each app publishes. Pawlo invites people with a shared link and everyone joins the same household. Dana gives a caregiver a graded role that limits what they see, and access can be set to close on a date you choose, which is the shape a temporary sitter actually needs.

Compare

Dana vs Pawlo: shared pet care, with or without the records

This is the closest comparison on the site. Both apps were built for the same argument, and the difference only shows up after that argument is settled.

Pawlo advertises one job and does not pretend otherwise. Its own homepage opens on the sentence "Never wonder if someone fed the pet." Feeding, walks and medication go on a shared list, every task shows who completed it and at what time, and the app is free with nothing held back.

Dana was built from the same argument. Where the two part company is the second question a household hits, usually a few months in, when the vet asks when the last booster was or a sitter needs the practice’s number at eight in the evening.

So this page is not really about which app coordinates better. On that row they are close, and pretending otherwise would waste your time. It is about whether you also want the pet’s health record living in the same place as the feeding log.

Capability	Dana	Pawlo
One shared list the whole household sees	✓	✓
Every task signed with who did it and when	✓	✓
Guards against a second dose	✓	✓
Unlimited pets and household members	✓	✓
Streaks and milestones	✓	✓
Home screen widget	✓	✓
Contribution summary per person	Monthly	Weekly
Price model	Free plan, optional Pro	Advertised free, all features
Medication history	✓	✓
Vaccines with next-due dates	✓	—
Weight	Trend chart	Health log
Vet documents stored with the record	Pro	—
Roles that limit what a caregiver sees	✓	—
Access that expires on a date you set	✓	—
GPS walk routes	✓	—
AI guidance when something feels wrong	✓	—

Two rows where Pawlo is the better answer

The first is price, and it is not close. Pawlo advertises the whole app free, with no subscription and no locked features, including unlimited pets and unlimited household members. Its release notes of 18 August say the same thing in the app itself; its App Store listing still shows Pawlo Pro purchases from before that change, so check the listing on the day you look. Dana has a free plan that covers the same coordination core, and it also has a Pro tier. If a paid tier existing at all is the thing you want to avoid, that is a real reason to pick Pawlo.

The second is the weekly summary. Pawlo advertises a per-person contribution breakdown every week, the kind that says one caregiver handled most of it. Dana’s nearest equivalent comes once a month: each pet’s monthly report counts every caregiver’s entries, so the split is there, on a slower rhythm.

Where the two apps stop overlapping

Pawlo is a coordination app. Its own feature list is feeding, walks, medication, streaks, widgets and history, its July release added a health log for weight, vet visits and medications, and nothing in its materials advertises next-due dates for vaccines, a weight trend or a place to keep the certificate itself.

That is the half Dana carries as well. Vaccines and medications have next-due dates rather than only last-done ones, weight builds into a series a vet can read, and Records Vault (Pro) holds the scanned documents behind a code-gated link that expires on its own. There is also a walk with a real GPS route, and Dana AI, which reads that pet’s own record and turns a worry into a next step without ever diagnosing.

So the question is what you expect to be doing in a year. If it is the same three tasks every day, Pawlo covers it for nothing. If the record is also going to matter, one app holding both is the point of Dana.

One limit to check before you commit

Pawlo is iPhone-only today and says so plainly. Its support pages put Android on the roadmap and offer a waitlist to be emailed the day it ships, so this is a dated gap rather than a permanent one. Today, though, a household where somebody carries an Android phone cannot all get in, and in a shared-care app that is not minor.

Check both current listings before you decide, because this page states only what each app advertises today.

Questions about this, answered

Does Pawlo show who fed the pet, like Dana does?: Yes. Attribution is not the difference between these two. Pawlo advertises task attribution in the same form Dana uses, down to the example on its homepage showing a task completed by a named person at a specific time. Any comparison that gives Dana that row alone has not read their site.
Then why would I pay for Dana?: You would not, for coordination alone. Dana’s free plan already covers unlimited pets, unlimited caregivers, attribution, reminders and streaks. Pro buys depth in the parts Pawlo does not advertise at all: a daily Dana AI allowance instead of the free plan’s one-time set of checks, the Records Vault for documents, and more streak protection.
Can I keep the actual vaccination certificate in either app?: In Dana, yes, in the Records Vault, which ships with Pro. It shares through a code-gated link that expires and can be revoked, so a clinic needs no account. Pawlo’s public materials do not advertise document storage.
Which one is better for a dog walker or a sitter?: Dana, on the evidence each app publishes. Pawlo invites people with a shared link and everyone joins the same household. Dana gives a caregiver a graded role that limits what they see, and access can be set to close on a date you choose, which is the shape a temporary sitter actually needs.